Thursday, August 26, 2010

My friend Nicole and the fundamentals of flavor

Wow, y'all -- sabbatical is fun! I've spent the summer doing a lot of things (obviously none of them were writing blog entries), only some of them food related. I've been hiking, kayaking, seen some plays, thought about Elizabethan protestant polemic (seriously more interesting than you would think). I went to Portland for my birthday and learned what a real food town feels like. More so than Seattle, even more so than San Francisco, Portland right now is a hot bed of chefs doing really innovative things with super fresh local ingredients. I strongly recommend Le Pigeon and Pok Pok, and you have got to try the breakfast pastrami at Kenny and Zuke's. The Saturday market there is huge and eye-popping, with literal truck loads of green beans the day we were there, and tons of people doing interesting, artisanal foods in their basements. More on that later . . . Local ingredients is the mania in Portland, but the other trend we noticed -- at Clyde Commons, Le Pigeon and a few other places -- is the communal table. There was a time in my life when this would have sent me screaming, but a wonderful thing about being older is that I care much less what other people think of me than I used to, so sitting at a communal table is actually kind of fun, and somehow seems to make the food feel more the center of attention.

However, what has finally nudged me to return to the blogosphere is a meal made by my friend Nicole during a recent trip to Glacier National Park. Glacier may be the only thing in my summer more beautiful than the bacon foie gras I had in Portland. After a 13+ mile hike up to Dawson's Pass, culminating in a jaw dropping vista of the Nyacke valley, I returned to the rental house to the equally impressive experience of a meal prepared by Nicole. Let me tell you about my friend Nicole: she is a stone cold good cook, and a master of the gourmet dinner party. She regularly makes her own stocks. She transforms rice into a symphony. I have never had anything she made that wasn't simply delicious, a feat made more amazing by the fact that she is usually cooking for between eight and thirty people. Impressive.

In Montana -- Hungry Horse, to be exact, just past the Deer Lick Saloon -- she was making a more modest meal for the five of us sharing the trip. The recipe was a classic Julia Child's, and, typical of Julia, labeled something modest like "Simple Saute of Beef and Mushrooms." And, in some ways, it was simple: beef, mushrooms, shallots, wine, potatoes, cream. The result, especially in Nicole's hands, was exquisite, and the more I have thought about that meal, the more I've realized that it illustrates a number of fundamentals of good cooking. So, since I'm not returning to the classroom any time soon (ha ha!), I thought I would do a little schooling here.

Lesson the first:
Brown means flavor. It is incorrect to say that browning caramelizes food, because caramelizing sugars is only a small part of the incredibly complicated chemical process that happens when you brown meat, technically called the Maillard reaction. Browning food, using high heat and a little oil, does tend to make things taste sweeter, but it also intensifies and complicates the flavors. If you are not using a non-stick pan (which you shouldn't be), browning also allows you to build up fond, the yummy brown bits stuck to the bottom of your pan. Fond is crucial to a good sauce. In this recipe, beef, mushrooms, and shallots are all browned successively, creating many layers of goodness. Plus, she browned a small dice of potatoes that she left out of the sauce, which added flavor but also a lovely crunch.

Lesson the second:
Good ingredients matter. Nicole sprung for filet for this meal, and I have to admit, I was skeptical. I generally think filet is expensive, doesn't have a good beefy flavor, and its vaunted tenderness often seems more mushy or even chalky to me. I was wrong -- filet was perfect for this dish. The fairly small pieces of meat (about two inches) had a lot of surface to be browned, so there was plenty of flavor developed, and the tenderness of the meat was sublime. Also, you need to respect your ingredients, which almost always means don't over cook them. Nicole's beef was sublime because it was medium rare bordering on rare. The same applies to most vegetables -- just cook them enough to take the rawness away, but leave some snap and crunch.

Lesson the third:
Classic combinations are classic for a reason. Beef, mushrooms, onions, cream. There are a million recipes featuring this combination for a reason: the flavors complement each other, so that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. It's the salad nicoise principle. There is nothing bad in a salad nicoise -- potato, green beans, tuna, olives, hard boiled eggs -- but on their own, none of these ingredients is a show stopper. But, you put them all together, and wow! So, if you start to notice the same cluster of ingredients showing up in many different types of dishes, pay attention. There's a reason.

Lesson the fourth:

Everything is better with sauce. It may not be the most sophisticated rule, but what can I say -- it's the frenchie in me. I over sauce my pasta. I put hollandaise on even the freshest of salmon. I like me a good pan sauce on almost everything. It's also just so easy to make a simple sauce: start with a pan filled with fond (see lesson the first), deglaze with some sort of acid. Nicole used red wine, but you can also use white wine, vermouth, lemon juice, balsamic vinegar, etc. If you don't have a lot of fond, you can punch up the flavor by also adding some sort of stock. Let these things reduce down a lot, and then swirl in either a little butter, a lot of butter, or cream. If you add cream, let it reduce a little as well. If you go butter, then turn the heat off before you add it, and just swirl it in. The next step in fanciness is to add some new flavor component: shallots and/or garlic are almost always a good choice. You could add mustard, or capers, or sun-dried tomatoes, or mustard. You get the idea. Taste for seasoning, and pour it over the meat.

Lesson the fifth and sixth:
You need fat to carry flavor. You need salt to be able to taste the flavors that are there. Good food isn't diet food, but I think those of us who learned our nutrition in the eighties overdid our fear of fat. The truth is, fat conveys flavor, so if you don't have fat in your dish, you need to have much more intense flavors to get anywhere with it. Meat with marbling, butter, cream -- these all make the existing flavor recognizable to your tongue. I don't know the chemistry of this one; I just know it's true. Right now, there's a lot in the news about the dangers of sodium, but if you cook for yourself, I guarantee you will consume less sodium than if you buy a lot of pre-made food. You have to salt your meat before you brown it, or it will never taste good. A bland sauce probably just needs a little salt to perk it up. At some point, adding more salt will make things saltier, but the amazing thing is that, for a while, adding salt changes the flavor profile without making it seem salty. Try it -- taste something without salt, and then keep tasting it as you add salt, until you hit the point when it seems actively salty. You get a huge range of flavor doing that.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Inland Empire Cuisine


I love Gourmet's Adventures with Ruth. I very much want to be Ruth Reichl's best friend. Or possibly just be Ruth Reichl. In fact, Ruth (I call her Ruth) is the newest member of my circle of ABM (All But Met) friends, people that I know would be my great friend if only we could get past the problem of never having met. John Stewart is also an ABM friend, as is Alison Janey. If you haven't seen this show, you should, and full episodes are available on line (see link above). In the episode about Laotian cooking, she eats ant egg salad, complete with live, angry, biting, and did I mention live red ants trying to protect their eggs, and she does it with a perfect blend of horror, good humor, and respect.

As one would expect with a travel show produced by Gourmet, the emphasis is on exploring a culture and an area through food. This means local ingredients and traditional recipes. In one episode, she travels to Seattle to discover Northwest cuisine, which means, not surprisingly, seafood. I was surprised that the first seafood celebrated was, in fact, not local: it was Copper river salmon. Copper river fisheries has pulled a brilliant marketing coup on the rest of the world, convincing us that their salmon is superior to all other salmon and that we should pay top dollar for it. It is great that most Copper river salmon is native rather than farm raised, and that the Copper river itself is undamned and pristine. However, there are two things wrong with Copper river salmon. First, it's sockeye salmon, which is very lean compared to King or Chinook salmon. It is unforgiving to cook, because if you over cook it even a degree, it becomes solid and dry. Even if you don't overcook it, it is a dense, dense piece of fish. Second, the Copper river is very, very far away from here. Indeed, it is very, very far away from most fish-consuming people. That means all Copper river salmon is either frozen or "ice-packed," which is pretty close to being frozen. It also means it has to fly from there to here, which increases its carbon footprint enormously. Copper river salmon travel nearly as far as an Atlantic salmon. And all the hype about increased Omega-3 oils? All salmon is high in Omega-3 oils. Fattier salmon -- like the aforementioned Chinook, King, and Atlantic -- have more than Sockeyes. So, when you want salmon, avoid Sockeyes, and seek out actually local, native, line-caught fish. And when you find a consistent source, let me know, would you?

Back to the episode. After learning about the "glories" of Copper River, Ruth and her arbitrary guest, Tom Skerritt -- who seems as baffled about his involvement of the show as I am -- travel to the wild of Hood Canal to feast on actually local shellfish and forage. Puget Sound oysters are, in my book, the best in the world. Willapa bay oysters are small and sweet, and there is nothing one can do to one of them that will improve it other than shuck it. Shuck it, eat it. How simple is that? The foraging doesn't seem to go so well, as they spend no film time on it, and the basket of bounty they return with seems to contain two fairly small fiddlehead ferns. In short, this episode is far and away the worst one in the series so far. It is an interesting question, I think whether this was simply a bad show, or whether Northwest cuisine is actually boring.

But, I'm interested in a different question: what is Spokane local cuisine like? Clearly, what is regional and typical for us is a far, far cry from Seattle dominated "Northwest" cuisine, since we simply don't have the same connection to the sea. Do we even have a local cuisine? We live in one of the world's great grain producing regions, and yet there is not a single artisanal flour mill in the area. (For a tour of a flour mill that will make you pant with desire, see the episode on Bath. Why can't we have one of those? and then a bread bakery that takes full advantage of it? I would happily run either operation!) The Palouse grows the majority of the world's lentils, and yet I am hard pressed to find lentils that haven't been shipped elsewhere for packaging and then shipped back here for sale.

I want to issue a challenge to everyone reading this blog: let's describe a regional cuisine for the Inland Empire. It should be local and tied to the traditions and history of our region, but it should also be exciting. And tasty -- I want it to be tasty. It shouldn't be Seattle-without-seafood, and it shouldn't veer into Montana lodge cooking either, although clearly those are both related cuisines. I'm envisioning a cookery that takes advantage of the great wine coming out of the Columbia basin, the amazing fruit from Yakima and Wenatchee, the grains and legumes from the Palouse. What else? Do you have any recipes that you think fit into the description "Inland Empire Cuisine"?